Brigade vs OpenClaw

Two open-source, self-hosted AI agents. One ships the org chart, memory, and connectors built in.

Brigade and OpenClaw are both MIT-licensed AI assistants you self-host on your own machine. The difference is what comes managed. OpenClaw gives you the primitives and leaves memory, integrations, and security for you to wire up. Brigade ships a crew of agents on a real org chart, Tideline long-term memory, 1,000+ Composio connectors, and five layers of security out of the box.

The short answer

Choose Brigade if you want the org chart, managed memory, and connectors built in. Choose OpenClaw if you want a lean terminal assistant you assemble yourself.

Brigade vs OpenClaw, side by side

Brigade
OpenClawOpenClaw
Memory
Tideline, managed memory graph
Plugin memory, opt-in
Goals & org chart
Goal-based agents on a real org chart
No org chart
Self-improving agents
Agents learn and improve, you approve
No
Connectors
1,000+ via Composio, managed
MCP + plugins, none managed
Security
Five layers, built-in
Built-in primitives, self-configured
Database & encryption
Switchable, encrypted (Convex)
DIY, no encryption at rest
Native channels
20+ chat apps, plus phone, watch, glasses & Quest
20+ chat apps, software only
Time to set up
One click
Terminal + WSL2 on Windows
Open source
MIT
MIT
Hosting
Self-host now, managed service soon
Self-hosted only
Pricing
Free, plus managed service (coming soon)
Free + DIY hosting + API costs

Where Brigade pulls ahead

A real org chart

Brigade routes goals to agents on an actual org chart that delegate and hand off. OpenClaw runs agents, but without goal-based routing or a chart.

Memory that is managed, not DIY

Tideline is a real memory graph with decay, trust, and poison resistance. OpenClaw's memory is an opt-in plugin you maintain yourself.

1,000+ connectors out of the box

Brigade ships 1,000+ managed Composio connectors. OpenClaw leaves you to wire up MCP servers and plugins.

One-click setup

Brigade launches in one click with nothing to host. OpenClaw needs a terminal, and WSL2 on Windows.

Where OpenClaw is a good pick

OpenClaw is a strong pick if you want a minimal, terminal-first assistant and prefer to assemble memory and integrations yourself. It is lean, fully open source, and self-hosted only, with no managed layer to depend on.

Frequently asked

Are Brigade and OpenClaw both open source?

Yes. Both Brigade and OpenClaw are MIT licensed and free to self-host. The difference is what each ships managed: Brigade includes memory, connectors, and security layers, while OpenClaw provides the primitives for you to configure.

What does Brigade have that OpenClaw doesn't?

Brigade adds a real org chart with goal-based routing, Tideline managed long-term memory, 1,000+ Composio connectors, self-improvement under your approval, five built-in security layers, and a switchable encrypted database. OpenClaw leaves most of those for you to wire up.

Is Brigade or OpenClaw easier to set up?

Brigade is easier for most people: it launches in one click with nothing to host. OpenClaw is terminal-first and needs WSL2 on Windows. If you prefer assembling your own stack, OpenClaw's lean approach may suit you better.

Can I run both Brigade and OpenClaw locally?

Yes. Both are self-hosted and run on your own machine, and both are model-agnostic, so they can use local models through Ollama as well as hosted providers. Your data and credentials stay with you in either case.

Try Brigade for free

Self-host the whole crew on your own machine. MIT licensed.

$ npm i @spinabot/brigadeGitHub